What’s Wrong With This Picture?
Where’s the Diversity?
Same-sex unions introduce
all-male-white-dominated public institutions.
Homosexuality is Gender-Exclusive
Heterosexuality is Gender-Inclusive
'Gay' Folks are Casualties of Homosexuality
• Homosexuality segregates men and women into same-sex groups
• Lesbians categorically exclude men, in the name of 'love' (i.e. discrimination)
• 'Gay' men categorically exclude women, in the name of 'love' (discrimination)
• Homosexual 'love' is intolerant to equality and diversity of the sexes
• 'Gay' men use women as 2nd-class, artificial sperm incubators for childbirth
• Homosexuality automatically excludes children in the name of 'love'
• Homosexual 'love' automatically excludes a child's mother or father
• The Constitution requires sex equality (e.g. man + woman heterosexuality)
• Nature maintains 50/50 equality of men and women on the planet
• One man + one woman is uniquely inclusive diversity & equality orientation
Most gay folks don't feel hate towards the
opposite sex. However, when it comes to 'love', homosexuality causes an otherwise
loving person to always exclude diversity and equality of the sexes simply because
the other person is different (i.e. complementary!). This is why people call homosexuality a perversion. Jesus required diversity and equality of the sexes in marriage in Matthew 19:4-6 and Luke 10, etc. Gay marriage is same-sex oriented, the opposite of
heterosexual diversity orientation: one man, one woman. In fact, gays claim to have a genetic (preconceived), unchangeable (intolerant), sexual preference for their
own sex (narrow-minded) above the diversity of the complementary sex. However, if each of us don't love gay folks, etc., and others who are different than ourselves than we are no better. We need to lovingly help LGBT folks, ourselves, and anyone else to be more diversity oriented.
Sexual preference is no better than racial preference, e.g. a white person always
preferring whites above blacks in the name of 'love'. Since when is anti-diversity a form of diversity?! Since when is discriminatory segregation a form of equality?!
Calling gender-exclusive or racially-exclusive anti-diversity a form of 'diversity' and 'love' that 'isn't hurting anybody', is at minimum a perversion of the English language and of common sense and logic, is a bad role-model to children, and would legally open the doors to all kinds of 'legalized' discrimination.
Help Spread the Word
Homosexuality is unconstitutional
anti-diversity and anti-equality.
In contrast, the US Constitution requires
gender equality under law. Heterosexuality (one man + one woman), the basic
building block of society, is sex equality and diversity orientation.
Hypocritically, gay activists demand
equality for themselves in the public schools, etc., yet they are intolerant of equality and diversity of the sexes in their own unions!
Homosexual equality, i.e. equality for sexual preference, is an oxymoron just like equality for same-race
orientation (racial preference) is an oxymoron.
Homosexuality Excludes Someone,
Simply Because They are Different
dis·crim·i·nate: To set apart as being different; to separate from another by discerning differences; - Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
preference [i.e. orientation] on the basis of sex,
race, etc., not by individual merit.
sex·ism: discriminatory behavior towards members of
the opposite sex - WordNet®
preference [or orientation] or favoritism...
big·ot: One who is strongly partial to one's own group [i.e. sex], religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ. - The American Heritage® Dictionary
Homosexuality makes one strongly
partial to one's own sex and intolerant of those who differ (when it comes to 'love'). Thus, homosexuality is divisive gender bigotry, gender-bias, gender phobia, or sexism in the name of 'love'.
Gay Folks are Casualties of Homosexuality
Help Spread the Word
Consider the following comparisons and
Sexism: "Our same-sex /
male dominated public institution is doing just fine without women in the board room.
Women can have managerial and other second-class positions or they can segregate into
their own same-sex institutions and treat men as second-class."
Sexism: "Our same-sex /
male dominated public marriage institution is doing just fine without a woman in a
leadership role. Our children are doing just fine without their mother's direct influence.
Men can perfectly replace women and we can use women as second-class artificial, sperm
incubators or nannies to serve our needs (while our unproductive union of men collects the
tax benefits) or they can segregate into their own same-sex institutions and treat men as
Sexism: "I am a male
bisexual. I was forced by the government to abandon half of my sexual identity and choose
to be either homosexual or heterosexual. I chose my same-sex, gender-exclusive
orientation. If our all-male-dominated same-sex union wants a child, we contract a woman
as a second-class womb-donor or nanny to serve us, then our unproductive same-sex union
collects the marriage tax benefits while the woman who bore our child gets nothing but
what we give her. This is what we call equality... Equality for sex-segregated
all-male-dominated public civil-marriage."
If Gender Equality is not
Good Enough for Gays, Then Why Should They Demand Equality from Others?
If you ignore and gloss over an
important step like this in logical thought process, you pervert the true logical outcome.
This is sleight-of-hand, and the result of people forming their logic around a desired
outcome, instead of using natural and universal truths.
The purpose of this website is to provide
real arguments and tools that transcend distorted liberal religious and secular arguments
so that you can be helpful in your efforts to influence gay and straight people for truth
by using the true language of equality and diversity. However, we need to realize that all
people have undesirable intolerant, anti-diversity, racist and sexist preferences that are
no worse in their bias than homosexuality is. Gay people are not an enemy. They are
victims of homosexuality.
However, if genetic alcoholics can
abstain from alcohol, like anyone, GLBT folks can abstain from acting upon their sexist, gender intolerant orientation.
The sexes are complementary
& Dependant by Nature
Men and women are complementary by natural design, being
uniquely qualified since the beginning of time, in every way psychologically, spiritually
and biologically to be synergistically united together in love. Both sexes are required
equally in order to create a complete family. This is true from any scientific, religious
or evolutionary perspective. However, nature never gave any qualifications or significant
purpose to same-sex.
It has been reported that animals exhibit
homosexual tendencies. However, animals also exhibit racist tendencies. Thus,
this does not justify human replication of animal behavior. In fact, it is unnatural and
Are we letting our compassion for the
homosexual's predicament cloud our judgment and make us completely lose our sensibility?
Same-Sex Orientation Treats the Opposite
Sex as Second-Class
Any woman that bears a child for a
male-dominated same-sex union, be it from gay or bisexual origins, is legally not treated
as worthy of the privilege of equal treatment within the all-male
leadership. This cannot be compared with an adoption that was an unplanned tragedy. By
preconception she would be relegated to a second-class womb-donor or nanny to serve the
needs of the men. Her leadership position is replaced by an unqualified man who had no
productive part in the child. In fact, this other male partner unfairly gets all
of the tax-payer funded marriage benefits at the expense of the woman. Similar
favoritism is found in female dominated same-sex unions which degrade men. The
family, the basic building block of society, becomes an icon of legalized sexism.
Is this what some folks in our 'intelligent' and 'enlightened' society are calling
This is part of what people are repulsed by intuitively
in gay marriage, but find it difficult to clearly articulate in a loving way. The
repulsion and anger is what gay people incorrectly call homophobia or hatred. However, the
repulsion of homosexuality cannot justify an unloving attitude towards our gay brothers
A Bisexual's Same-Sex Union Cannot Provide
Equal Treatment of Genders
We already have 100% gender
equality and diversity in traditional marriage, why would we want to purposely eliminate
diversity in certain cases because of [genetic] gender bias... under the guise of
diversity? The same-sex campaign of smoke and mirrors needs to be exposed publicly.
Two genders follow the rules of
binary logic which only allows gender equality one way and only one way: one man + one
woman... The perfect and oldest equal-rights institution in history!
way you look at it, the examples above demonstrate the illogic of the liberal
'enlightened' mind. Their outcome-based logic is full of ever-changing logical bases and
holes that any true logical person can fill-in with truth in order to invalidate the
Heterosexuality is a
Preference Inclusive of Gender Diversity
Heterosexuality (man + woman) always
rejects same-sex anti-diversity. In contrast to same-sex unions, the diversity of one man
and one woman in marriage guarantees that both genders have equal opportunity, equal
dignity and shared authority, in different synergistic roles, in the leadership of the
family and awards both genders equally and fairly with civil-marriage tax benefits. This
is what the US constitution means by equal treatment. In contrast, same-sex guarantees
unequal segregated male domination and female domination.
The marriage of one man + one woman is the oldest
civil-rights institution in history. Anything else causes discrimination.
We need to publicly promote the
language of equality and diversity in the correct way before we lose its meaning
completely! Read on to discover more arguments that you can use to turn the
smoke-and-mirrors of same-sex marriage on its head.
Same-Sex 'Equality' is an
Homosexuality is [genetic]
anti-diversity, by definition. Same (i.e. homo) is the opposite of diverse. Homosexuality
is really nothing more than diversity-intolerance. In fact, same-sex unions open
the door to taxpayer funded all-white-male-dominated institutions containing both zero
racial diversity and zero gender diversity. In contrast, interracial marriage
create more diversity. Why do we want to go backwards and create less diversity?
Since there is zero gender diversity in a
same-sex union, same-sex unions also contain zero gender equality.
Without diversity, there can be no equality. As a result, genders are sex-segregated into
unconstitutional male and female dominated institutions. "Separate is seldom,
if ever, equal". In contrast, one man & one woman is the result of a unique
preference for gender diversity and equality: heterosexuality (perfectly mirroring
the equal treatment requirements of the US Constitution).
Each gender-dominant family/tribe treats the
complementary gender as subservient and second-class. In fact, gay men often have girl
friends on the side, but these women are never allowed the privilege of an exclusive union
with either of the men. This is similar to blacks serving as companions for rich white
folks, but never with full equality. Thus, even though gay folks, bisexuals, court
justices and supporters of gay marriage legislation may be nice people, they unknowingly
prefer unconstitutional gender discrimination when they prefer same-sex unions.
Anyone preferring same-sex unions, from bisexual or
homosexual origin, is preferring that women or men be sex-segregated into separate
institutions even though complementary genders are uniquely and fully qualified by design
to be partners in marriage.
Ironically the 50th anniversary of Brown v Board
of Education was being celebrated, as the end of race-segregation, on the same day as
sex-segregation was being implemented in Massachusetts by way of same-sex marriage!
In contrast, our constitution codifies a
requirement for equal treatment and diversity of genders, not same-gender. This
means that the Massachusetts SJC recently wrote unconstitutional discrimination
into law. It is obvious that there is no "rational basis" for
government endorsement or funding of same-sex unions of any kind.
Government Funded Institutions
By codified preconception, our laws and taxes will now
support male-dominated same-sex families which automatically treat irreplaceable women as
second-class or subservient womb-donors, concubines or nannies (and vice-versa). In fact,
the vast majority of same-sex unions are white-male-dominated. Thus, our
government is now promoting all-white-male-dominated institutions with benefits funded by
your tax dollars.
In same-sex unions, the unique contribution, complementary
synergy and beautiful balance of the opposite sex is discarded. Sexual relations
are degraded to a purely recreational, unnatural function of mutual-masturbation or sodomy
(combining feces / human waste and genitalia). Is this love? Is
this equality? Are we expected to feel warm and fuzzy about feces and sodomy and
sexism in same-sex 'romance'?
However, most gays did not choose to feel
homosexual feelings. They are victims of homosexuality, but they can choose how to react
to it. We need to lovingly help the homosexual to acknowledge and deal with the sexist
bias introduced into their lives by homosexuality.
If genetic obese folks can abstain from overindulgence, gay folks can abstain from
acting upon sexist preference.
Preference = Racism
Preference = Sexism
preference (bias) on the basis of class (sex, race…), not by individual merit.
prej·u·dice: preconceived preference
or orientation or favoritism...
Racism: “I’m white and oriented to
whites above blacks”
Sexism: “I’m male and oriented to men above women”
Why is Same-Sexism
Taught in Schools?
Why not promote same-race preference
(racism) as a form of diversity in schools as a viable alternative lifestyle for kids,
since we now promote same-sex preference? This is a good question or legal challenge to
bring before your school boards and legislators.
Same-Sex Contains No
Same-sex unions should be
treated as single-parent families. There is no "state interest" or
productive outcome from same-sex unions except by the misuse of the opposite gender as a
second-class womb/sperm donor. Same-sex•ism is not a good example of equality to
children and is not worthy of government funding. This cannot be compared to the tragedy
of an infertile diverse-gender couple. In the corporate realm, our government would not
allow government funding to a company partnerships who declares a preference for same-sex
male-dominated or same-race (racism) white-dominated, etc., leadership.
Why should the family, the
basic institution of society be an icon of tax-payer funded sexism?
These are fundamental same-sex
marriage arguments and questions and answers that you are encouraged to use in
discussions, debates and news conferences! The intention here is to provide arguments in
the language of equality and diversity to help open the eyes of society and our gay
brothers and sisters and to expose how homosexuality harms gay folks and all of society.
START TALKING ABOUT IT!
Start a discussion and then ask the following
A: Is diversity good? yes/no (hint: yes)
B: Is zero diversity bad? yes/no (hint: yes)
C: How much gender diversity is in same-sex? zero/100%
Conclusion - same-sex unions have zero gender
diversity and thus zero gender equality. Why then are same-sex
unions and homosexuality being promoted under the guise of diversity and equality? Doesn't
this mean that the Massachusetts SJC redefined diversity to now include diverse forms of anti-diversity
(sexism)? Isn't this equivalent to changing the laws to support racism as though that is a
new form of diversity? Let's look at what zero diversity really means.
Racism: "We're doing just
fine without blacks in our company’s all-white leadership"
Sexism: "We're doing just
fine without a woman in our gay family’s all-male leadership"
Sexism: "Our children are
doing just fine without a mom in our gay family’s all-male leadership"
This is called sexism and sex-segregation
is the dividing of men and women into different clans or groups. Gay folks may not realize
that homosexuality is sex-discrimination. In reality,
homosexuality is a preference for ZERO gender diversity and thus ZERO
The Basic Function of
Homosexuality is Simple: to Eliminate Gender Equality
If Genetic Alcoholics Can Avoid Drink,
Gays Can Avoid Acting Upon Sexist Orientation
Our constitution has a codified
bias for equal treatment of classes (genders, race, etc.)
We the people should adopt the same bias
as the constitution. How can we do this?...
A. Heterosexuality is a bias for 100%
class diversity and thus 100% equality.
B. Homosexuality is a bias for Zero
gender diversity and thus Zero equality.
In order to mirror the constitution,
considering there are only two genders, a preference for gender diversity means
only one thing: one man, one woman. This is consistent with the law of binary
logic. Anything else, like bi-sexuality, requires promiscuity by definition (i.e. sex with
men and women equally) and is thus inconsistent with marriage or is discrimination by
diluting the 100% equal treatment of genders of heterosexuality.
causes gay men to prefer the most privileged
people in their lives to be only of their “own kind”, separating women as second class. “Separate is seldom, if ever, equal”. Children
and society see, by role model, that women have no equality within a typical
all-white-male-dominated family leadership (and vice-versa). Children
are denied the unique qualities and intimate contribution a mom provides. And with
all-female-dominated same-sex unions, children are denied a full-time dad. Men are
second-class sperm-donors and mannies.
Why Should the Family, the Building
Block of Society, Become Codified into Law as a Same-Sex Icon of Inequality and Legalized
Is our compassion for gay folks
predicament clouding our judgment and making us totally lose our sensibility?